![]() ![]() ![]() election." In a summary put out by the White House of a July 25 call, Trump asked Zelensky to "look into" Joe and Hunter Biden. ![]() The whistleblower said officials were concerned Trump "is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. The allegation that Trump pressured Zelensky to dig up dirt on the former vice president in exchange for releasing $400 million already approved by Congress stems from an anonymous whistleblower complaint that prompted House Democrats to conduct an impeachment inquiry into the president. "There was no quid pro quo…I think Mick Mulvaney clarified his statement to be very clear…I take Mick Mulvaney at his word for clarification…I think Mick was very clear in cleaning up his statement." /ySjKcL8LUN- CSPAN October 18, 2019 But that message evolved from vehement denial, to embracing the help of foreign countries in rooting out corruption, to yesterday: Bargaining with aid in exchange for an investigation into domestic politics is normal. Republicans who support Trump have all echoed a similar refrain: There was no quid pro quo. Mulvaney reversed those statements later in the day, claiming the media spun his words and that the president never asked him to tie the aid money to the investigation of the server. ![]() Rather, Mick Mulvaney told reporters the delay in aid was tied to a Trump administration theory that Ukraine was involved in hacking the Democratic National Committee's servers in 2016. The arrangement didn't have anything to do with Trump's request that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky look into 2020 rival Joe Biden. The White House changed course on Thursday when President Donald Trump's acting chief of staff told reporters that yes, there had been a quid pro quo involved in delaying military aid to Ukraine. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |